>> << >>
Главная Выпуск 23

Why should mitochondria define species?

Stoeckle M.Y. The Rockefeller University; Thaler D.S. University of Basel
Декабрь 2018
Опубликовано 2018-12-29 17:00

Stoeckle M.Y.
Program for the Human Environment
The Rockefeller University
1230 York AVE
New York, NY 10065
USA
Email: mark.stoeckle@rockefeller.edu


Thaler D.S.
Biozentrum, University of Basel
Klingelbergstrasse 50/70
CH - 4056 Basel
Switzerland
Email: david.thaler@unibas.ch
davidsthaler@gmail.com

HUMAN EVOLUTION Vol. 33 - n. 1-2 (1-30) - 2018

 


DOI: 10.14673/HE2018121037


Why should mitochondria define species?
Key words: Species evolution,
mitocondrial evolution, speciation,
human evolution.


HUMAN EVOLUTION Vol. 33 - n. 1-2 (1-30) - 2018


More than a decade of DNA barcoding encompassing
about five million specimens covering 100,000 animal
species supports the generalization that mitochondrial
DNA clusters largely overlap with species as defined by
domain experts. Most barcode clustering reflects synonymous substitutions. What evolutionary mechanisms account for synonymous clusters being largely coincident
with species? The answer depends on whether variants
are phenotypically neutral. To the degree that variants are
selectable, purifying selection limits variation within species and neighboring species may have distinct adaptive
peaks. Phenotypically neutral variants are only subject
to demographic processes—drift, lineage sorting, genetic
hitchhiking, and bottlenecks. The evolution of modern
humans has been studied from several disciplines with
detail unique among animal species. Mitochondrial barcodes provide a commensurable way to compare modern
humans to other animal species. Barcode variation in the
modern human population is quantitatively similar to that
within other animal species. Several convergent lines of
evidence show that mitochondrial diversity in modern
humans follows from sequence uniformity followed by
the accumulation of largely neutral diversity during a
population expansion that began approximately 100,000
years ago. A straightforward hypothesis is that the extant
populations of almost all animal species have arrived at
a similar result consequent to a similar process of expansion from mitochondrial uniformity within the last one to
several hundred thousand years.

 

 

 полный текст статьи -  Stockle_Thaler

Читайте также:

Does the evolution in vivo occur strictly according to Darwin, or not only according to Darwin

Technique does not evolve according to Darwin

TABOO OF EVOLUTION AND TABOO OF CIVILIZATION

Life on earth has existed for billions of years thanks to the observance of a number of prohibitions (taboos). Which in the biocenosis before the appearance of man were never disturbed - even if it was beneficial for certain species in the struggle for existence. Studying the list of taboos of all living things, as well as the mechanisms that in the biocenosis ensure their unconditional implementation in the evolution of all species, genera, families and classes of living beings, is an urgent and fundamental problem.

Естестеннонаучная гипотеза вымирания динозавров

ДИНОЗАВРЫ, КОТОРЫЕ ЖИЛИ НА ОТКРЫТОМ СОЛНЦУ ПРОСТРАНСТВЕ, ВЫМЕРЛИ, А НАХОДИВШИЕСЯ ПОД ЗАЩИТОЙ ДРЕВЕСТНОЙ ТЕНИ ИЛИ ВОДЫ, ВЫЖИЛИ.

Созидательный взрыв. Возможет ли?

Взрывы, используемые человеком, являются разрушительными. Примером созидательного взрыва является Большой Взрыв Вселенной. Согласно современным воззрениям, звезды, молекулы, жизнь и человек возникли из Большого Взрыва без дополнительного внешнего вмешательства. Если так, каковы должны были быть законы природы и начальные условия, которые обеспечили эволюцию вселенной, появление жизни и человека?

Добавить комментарий

Оставлять комментарии могут только зарегистрированные пользователи.
Войдите в систему используя свою учетную запись на сайте:
Email: Пароль:

напомнить пароль

Регистрация