>> << >>
Главная Выпуск 29 Жизнь во время и после КоронаВируса
Жизнь во время и после КоронаВируса

Создатель шведской системы борьбы с вирусом без карантина и закрытия бизнесов признал, что если бы карантин был, смертей было бы меньше

the man behind the policy Anders Tegnell
Июнь 2020
People enjoy the warm evening at Sundspromenaden in Malmo, Sweden, on May 26, 2020Image copyrightAFP
Image captionSwedes have been told to maintain social distancing but there has been no lockdown

Sweden's controversial decision not to impose a strict lockdown in response to the Covid-19 pandemic led to too many deaths, the man behind the policy, Anders Tegnell, has acknowledged.

Sweden has seen a far higher mortality rate than its nearest neighbours and its nationals are being barred from crossing their borders.

Mr Tegnell told Swedish radio more should have been done early on.

"There is quite obviously a potential for improvement in what we have done."

Sweden has counted 4,468 deaths and 38,589 infections in a population of 10 million, while Denmark, Norway and Finland have imposed lockdowns and seen far lower rates.

Denmark has seen 580 deaths, Norway has had 237 deaths and Finland 320.

How Tegnell's views have changed

Mr Tegnell, who is Sweden's state epidemiologist and in charge of the country's response to Covid-19, told BBC News in April that the high death toll was mainly because homes for the elderly had been unable to keep the disease out, although he emphasised that "does not disqualify our strategy as a whole".

Media captionSwedish state epidemiologist Anders Tegnell argued in April that Sweden’s strategy is largely working

Now he has told Swedish public radio: "If we were to encounter the same disease again, knowing exactly what we know about it today, I think we would settle on doing something in between what Sweden did and what the rest of the world has done."

Media captionCoronavirus: How Sweden is keeping its pubs and bars open

When asked if too many people had died too soon, Mr Tegnell said, "Yes, absolutely."

However, he was unclear what Sweden should have done differently.

As other countries had imposed immediate lockdowns, it was unknown which measures had the best effect in halting the spread, he explained.

Sweden's approach had been to increase its response step by step, he said, so maybe they would find out what was best as measures were gradually lifted.

What was Sweden's response?

Although there was no lockdown, Sweden relied on voluntary social distancing, banning gatherings of more than 50 people and halting visits to elderly care homes.

Non-essential travel is still not recommended under national guidelines, but journeys of up to two hours are allowed to see relatives or close friends as long as they do not involve visits to local shops and mixing with other residents.

Denmark's Superliga football championship has resumed behind closed doorsImage copyrightREUTERS
Image captionDenmark's lockdown restrictions were among the first in Europe to be lifted

As Denmark and Norway have begun opening up again, there has been growing criticism of Sweden's response, both inside the country and among its neighbours.

Norway's public health chief Frode Forland said Sweden had focused too much on historical models of viruses, while its neighbours preferred lockdown measures.

Sweden's former state epidemiologist Annika Linde believes Sweden got its response wrong and should have focused on three things:

  • An early lockdown
  • Greater protection of care homes
  • Intensive testing and contact tracing in areas of outbreaks

According to Swedish media, Mr Tegnell and his family were subjected to threats by email last month.

Добавить комментарий

Оставлять комментарии могут только зарегистрированные пользователи.
Войдите в систему используя свою учетную запись на сайте:
Email: Пароль:

напомнить пароль